New Federal Contractor Rules Address Employment Challenges Federal Data Show Don鈥檛 Exist By Imposing Anti-Discriminatory Measures Federal Data Makes Clear Aren鈥檛 Needed
The chief executive officer of the Associated General Contractors of America, Stephen E. Sandherr, issued the following statement in response to the administration鈥檚 decisions to finalize despite federal data indicating no need for the new measures:
鈥淭he administration鈥檚 decision to finalize two new oppressive employment regulations for federal contractors forces us to object to measures whose goals we support and objectives our members already meet. That is because these rules will force federal contractors to spend an a year to produce reams of new paperwork proving they are doing what the federal government already knows they are doing.
鈥淎dministration officials claim these rules are necessary to address higher rates of unemployment among veterans and the disabled. Yet shows that the annual average unemployment rate was lower for every category of veteran covered by this rule than compared to the nonveteran unemployment rate. The only exception was that the unemployment rate for 鈥淕ulf War era II鈥 veterans was slightly higher than for nonveterans (9.9 percent vs. 9.0 percent), likely because they returned to the work force during a protracted economic downturn. also shows that veterans of all ages are already more likely to be employed by construction firms than are non-veterans. Federal data also indicates that people with disabilities are as likely to be employed in construction as people without disabilities.
鈥淚n their effort to counter non-existent employment challenges, the administration has developed two rules that require federal contractors to take extensive measures to combat discriminatory practices the federal government already knows barely exist. A of eight years of the most recent federal enforcement data found that only 0.02 percent of all federal contractors could be seriously suspected of discriminating against veterans or the disabled.
鈥淕iven the lack of justification for these new measures, we will closely review all appropriate legal options available to protect employers 鈥 who have already made sure veterans and the disabled are well represented in the workforce 鈥 from billions in unneeded new regulatory costs.鈥